EA Sports - A Tale of Two Tribal Strategies

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

Many of you would know that I have been following EA Sports’ game development/marketing strategy - specifically around the Madden NFL and NCAA Football titles.

First, a little background.  The versions of those games on current generation of consoles (Xbox 360 and Playstation 3) has not lived up to expectations.  This has caused great debate amongst the tribe members, EA Executives, and the development teams on how future iterations of the two games should be developed.

For better or for worse, the two titles have gone in opposite directions in terms of strategy.  One only needs to look at fan sites such as Operation Sports to see the difference.

  • Madden
    • Philosophy: No gimmicks: “Everything You See on Sunday”
    • Target:  Core gamers, football fans - The Tribe.
    • Community interaction:  Very high
      • Developers are constantly interacting on 3rd party sites, EA Sports blog, etc.
      • Several high ranking people within the tribe were invited to their studios to work on an early build of the game.  Changes were made that day
      • Purposefully Develop content -> Release to the tribe -> Allow tribe to react -> Modify
        • Modifications of certain parts of the game were made after the developers released screenshots/videos of the game.  Example: Ben Roethlisberger looked too small in one of the early screenshots; the community reacted to the picture and gave their response.  The development team fixed it.
    • Additions to the game: Focused on giving the game an authentic feel while playing the game.
      • Major improvements in aesthetics, game play and CPU intelligence
  • NCAA
    • Philosophy: A little bit of everything
    • Target:  Casual gamers, people who love college football - Mass audience
    • Community interaction:  Moderate
      • Developers are sporadic with their interaction.  They are hesitant to answer the tough questions
      • Minor issues that are brought up by the community are often shelved for next year’s release - i.e. no urgency to fix issues for this year’s version
    • Additions to the game: Focused on adding gimmicks that appeal to casual gamers
      • Season Showdown - earn virtual points for playing the game
      • Minor updates to presentation, gameplay and CPU intelligence

As expected, the reaction from the tribe has been quite different for each title.

Madden fans love the interaction with the developers, changes to the development philosophy and addition of features that make the game realistic.  But will casual gamers enjoy this title?  Will sales volume drop due to lack of features that appeal to casual gamers?

NCAA fans are starting to feel as if the development team is completely ignoring them.  Features that make the game realistic have not been added (despite several tribe members bringing it to the developer’s attention).  Gimmicks such as Season Showdown are being laughed at by the tribe.  But will these additions make more casual buyers pick up the title?  Will sales volume increase due to the addition of features that appeal to casual gamers?  What is the impact of leaving the tribe out?

We are yet to see what actually happens, NCAA Football is released mid-July while Madden is released in mid-August.

So the question is what should your brand do?  Should you focus on making your product/service for your tribe OR for the audience at large? 

As you may have guessed, our philosophy is to focus on your tribe and let them bring others in the fold.

Good Insights From The Yes We Did Book Launch

Friday, June 5th, 2009

I went to the Yes We Did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand book launch yesterday at Rotman.  Rahaf Harfoush did an excellent job chronicling her time working on the Obama campaign and pulled out key insights which the audience could apply to their organization and brands.

One of the things that resonated with me was how she strongly believes in building the right strategy before jumping into social media.  I couldn’t agree more, the strategy needs to come first.

I look forward to reading the book.

Good Video on Tribal

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

I found this online.  It is a pretty cool video.  Enjoy!

Thinking Tribal Can Be Difficult

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Often we hear people talk about Tribes without fully understanding what they are and how they work.  The most common misconception is that tribes are just segments.  However, the key differentiation between a segment and a tribe is that in a tribe, the relationship between the members is very important.  Whereas a segment (no matter how narrowly defined) does not require members of the group to connect or communicate.

When you think tribally, you have to shift your paradigm.  Start thinking about how your product or service can best support the tribe instead of focusing on how to target a certain segment or demographic.  A Tribal Strategy should be more than a novel communication plan.  Here is an example of an article by Avi Dan in AdAge that illustrates the point.

As markets become more tribal, they must recalibrate from broadcasting to narrowcasting and reach targets more efficiently and more effectively through tools such as behavioral targeting and addressable TV. They must also adopt a more granular view of customers by making analytics the cornerstone of any marketing effort. Most marketers are still committed to traditional communication vehicles, primarily TV. But the lesson from the rapid rise of social networking is that people prefer to have a conversation and dialogue within their networks, not an interruptive, one-way communication through TV commercials. Marketers must learn to adapt if they want their communication to maintain its effectiveness with a suddenly harder to please consumer.

In the following sentence, he talks about targeting certain demographics rather than supporting tribes.

Most marketers focus on Gen X and Gen Y, with a combined buying power of $1 trillion, but ignore African-Americans, with buying power in excess of $1.5 trillion, and baby boomers, with $2.1 trillion. Hispanic buying power is growing at three times the national average and will reach $1 trillion in 2011; Asian-Americans spend three times as much as Gen Yers; and gay Americans clock in at $800 billion. Ignoring these segments will put undue pressure on your profitability in an environment resistant to price increases.

“Tribal Marketing” is Growing in Popularity

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

It has been quite interesting to see the rise of Tribes and Tribal Marketing in the lexicon of marketers over the last 8-9 months.  When we started this blog back in August 2008,  we were amongst only a few people actively talking about it.  Nowadays, Tribal Marketing is becoming a part of the active conversation for many.

Here are the Google Trends results for the search term “tribal marketing” [Click for larger image].

As marketers continue to search for innovative ways to reach their consumers, I predict that more and more people will be looking to Tribal Marketing as a part of the solution.

Forget About Brand Control, Strive For Clarity

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Clay Shirky Says Forget About Brand Control, Strive For Clarity

I agree.  Nothing more to say.

Understand The Impact of Tribal Marketing - The Need for Tribal Strategy

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

One of the things I discuss with clients is that the process of leveraging consumer tribes is often driven by marketing, but will require you to understand the impact within the entire organization.  Hence, we use the term Tribal Strategy to define our work - of which Tribal Marketing is a part.

Here are some areas of the organization that we consider, capture and revise in the Tribal Strategy plan:

  • Operations:
    • Product design and development
    • Production methods and materials (i.e. going green)
    • Guidelines and processes for using Web 2.0 tools
  • Finance/Budgeting
    • Ensuring the outputs of the Tribal Strategy Measurement Plan will be compatible with ongoing budgeting requirements
  • Human Resources
    • Update/review job descriptions to include new required activities (i.e. events, online interaction, etc)
    • Do you require additional staff with relevant capabilities?

In addition, here are some other functions that may be impacted:

  • Management Information Systems (MIS):
    • What data do we need to collect?  What are we missing? How do you translate it into the current reporting format?
  • Planning: 
    • Ensure that senior management include Tribal Strategy in their quarterly/annual planning process
  • Technologies:
    • What technology do we need to add to execute?  Should we bring technology in-house or should we outsource it?

Please keep in mind this is just a short example.  The actual areas of impact and key points to consider will vary depending on the organization and the situation.

Colloquy’s Research Comes To The Wrong Recommendation

Friday, April 17th, 2009

Colloquy released its findings on a study looking at Motivations of Canadian Brand-Specific Social Networking.

A WOM Champion is a customer who is “actively recommending” a brand, in a conversation with a relative, in an email to friends, in a Twitter posting or a Facebook wall message. “The personal nature of the communication by a WOM Champion adds credibility,” says COLLOQUY Partner Kelly Hlavinka. “And a Champion’s endorsement is highly valued by marketers because it cannot be bought; it must be earned.”

When COLLOQUY asked more than 3,500 Canadians why they engage in WOM activity regarding their preferred products, services and brands to people within their networks, the top five motivations of WOM Champions were as follows:

  • To be the first to discover new items: 71 percent
  • To get free product samples: 66 percent
  • To get smart about products/services: 66 percent
  • To tell manufacturers what I think: 63 percent
  • To share my opinion with others: 58 percent

The COLLOQUY research also revealed significant evidence of a direct correlation between reward program activity and consumers’ positive WOM endorsement activity. Here are some of the key findings:

  • Loyalty program members are 127 percent more likely to be WOM Champions than the general population
  • 31 percent of loyalty program members are self-described WOM Champions
  • Only 15 percent of non-loyalty program members are self-described WOM Champions
  • 68 percent of WOM Champions in loyalty programs intend recommend a program sponsor’s brand within a year
  • Actively participating loyalty program members are over 3 times more likely than non-active members, and over 7 times more likely than non-members, to be WOM Champions

The research is certainly interesting and gives a good sense as to what motivates people to engage in WOM activities.  Also, I like the possibility of using a loyalty database to identify potential tribe leaders.  However, I don’t necessarily agree with the main conclusion:

“This research shows that a company’s loyalty marketing database is an under-utilized social network that marketers would do well to exploit in the pursuit of positive, profitable WOM activity,” says COLLOQUY Editorial Director Rick Ferguson. “Marketers should locate the Champions buried within their program memberships, find ways to encourage WOM activity and reward Champions for positive WOM behavior.”

Here are my 2 points of difference:

  1. The database itself may not be the social network - in other words the members of the database may not necessarily be a network but rather a group of individuals with similar purchase behaviours
  2. Activating the tribe is a bit more complex then just ‘locating the champions and incentivize them to display WOM behaviour’. 
    • The real question you must ask is “Why haven’t my ‘best customers’ started to engage in WOM activities already?”  There could be some fundamental issues from a marketing, product design/experience, customer service, etc that needs addressing first.

Tribal Strategy Goes Beyond Consumer Marketing

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

Most of our discussions with people revolve around using Tribal Strategy in the realm of Tribal Marketing.  However, it is important to know that a Tribal Strategy can go beyond marketing. 

Over the past few months I have gone into meetings with the intention to solely discuss our Corporate Development services and just happen to mention our Tribal Strategy practice area.  The people I met with immediately were interested in learning more on how tribes can impact their business:

  • One person was a CEO of a mid-sized biotech company and believed that private investors and VCs often behave like tribes
  • The other was an Executive Director of an industry organization looking at how researchers, scientists and buyers of intellectual property interact as tribes

By developing a tribal strategy both of the above organizations can leverage new ways to pitch to investors or connect people with various but complimentary backgrounds for the greater good.

Highlights of The 2009 Sponsorship Marketing Council of Canada Conference & Awards

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

 

I went to the SMCC Conference yesterday and I thought most of the segments were well presented. 

The key conference takeaways were summarized well by Alan Middleton’s 3C’s.  Alan is the Executive Director at Schulich Executive Education Centre and was the MC for most of the day.

The 3C’s plus my takeaways:

  • Community
    • Almost all the speakers highlighted the need to work with and do work for the community
    • This fits well with the Tribal Approach whereby you look at supporting the tribe rather than marketing to it
  • Commitment
    • In order for a sponsorship partnership to be successful, there needs to be commitment from both senior management and employees
    • Most of the initiatives discussed during the day included a strong commitment from employees to deliver their results (best example was how Scotiabank was able to get their employees on board for numerous events that they sponsor)
  • Continuity
    • This goes for any successful campaign but especially sponsorship
    • If you don’t tell people you are sponsoring something, you won’t get the recognition you are looking for and deserve
    • Also, make sure you have an integrated plan especially if you are sponsoring a one-time or infrequent event

Sponsorship can be a part of a complete Tribal Strategy.  The key thing is to make sure you know how it all fits together and how it impacts your entire organization.